top of page
logo updated.png

Our Thesis

Retooling Philanthropy for Scalable Climate Solutions

Today, for the first time in history, more new global electricity capacity comes from technology than from fossils. This transition is driving down costs, expanding energy access, and making electricity cleaner and more reliable than ever. As global energy demands increase, we need new technologies more than ever before. This astounding technological transformation was largely set in motion through philanthropy over a century ago¹. During this period, private grants fueled groundbreaking advancements in science, technology, and engineering.² When these technologies standardized and price points dropped, institutional investors scaled them further. 

 

In the early days, philanthropy accounted for just 1% of GDP. Since the 1980s, the sector experienced an astounding 450% growth, reaching 5.5% of GDP today. Yet, along the way, it completely lost its transformative impact. Today, the average grant is roughly $28,000³, insufficient to fund a single salary, much less scale a breakthrough climate solution for institutional investment.

Why has philanthropy stagnated? Many foundations consider the practice of meeting the minimum public benefit, or granting just 5% of assets in a given year, as "best practice." From this, many scatter-shot tiny grants rather than deploy strategically. As a result, the large-scale granting that had enabled the system-wide transformations of the past is today exceedingly rare. With only 2% of philanthropic capital currently going into climate, this is particularly problematic for climate solutions, which require substantial capital to scale.

We believe the only viable path to meaningfully accelerate the climate transition is to accelerate institutional investment in it. And, the only way to do that is to leverage philanthropy at scale. 

We do this with four important steps. 1) Pool grants to diversify the funding base while developing a strong capital base; 2) develop a model where philanthropic capital is not just granted once but strategically reinvested, allowing continuous deployment and exponential impact; 3) direct the model to scale climate solutions; and 4) pair the solutions with institutional investors, who control $165 trillion in risk capital, for further scaling.

While these steps seem simple, executing them requires expertise, coordination, and a dedicated infrastructure—something TheNewClimate is uniquely positioned to provide.  As history has shown, transformative change begins with philanthropy. Our vision is a future where philanthropy reclaims its boldness—where philanthropists embrace risk, champion innovation, and catalyze systemic change. This vision is pragmatic. It operates independently of policy shifts or government intervention. In fact, the tools to begin are already in our hands.

Footnotes:

  1. The Age of Modern Public Good refers to the era of modern philanthropy and foundation development, beginning around 1900. This period saw an unprecedented rise in large-scale philanthropic giving, primarily led by industrial magnates who established foundations to address systemic societal challenges. The Carnegie Corporation, founded in 1911, focused on education and scientific research, leading to the creation of over 2,500 public libraries. The Rockefeller Foundation, established in 1913, played a pivotal role in funding medical research, including the development of the yellow fever vaccine. During this time, philanthropy supported the establishment of institutions like the National Academy of Sciences, the University of Chicago, and the development of early public health infrastructure. These large, transformative grants reshaped public education, healthcare, and scientific innovation, setting a precedent for modern philanthropy. This period saw the establishment of major philanthropic institutions that played a pivotal role in funding scientific, educational, and social advancements.

  2. Examples include the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations, which funded universities, medical research institutions, and public libraries; the Guggenheim Foundation, which supported early aerospace research; the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, which advanced biomedical research; and the Ford Foundation and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, which contributed to breakthroughs in physics, computer science, and industrial engineering.

  3. The $28,000 average grant figure is based on data from the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS)and Candid (formerly the Foundation Center), which track U.S. foundation giving trends.

Buckle up.png

Buckle Up

Let’s call a duck a duck. We are now in the Turbulent Transition. There’s no denying it. The coming years will put unprecedented strain on our natural systems, driven by rising energy demands that surpass near-term capacity, competing interests, and the complex challenge of navigating evolving policy priorities at every level. While new technologies promise a dreamy future, the decisions we make today will determine how bumpy the transition to it will be.

bottom of page